IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Courtney Ben Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 59 11 11 22 0.373 0.1121 0.1121 — —
2019-20 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 45 12 5 17 0.378 0.1136 0.1136 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian D3 NCHA — 30 26 16 42 1.400
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA — 29 22 21 43 1.483
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA — 17 5 4 9 0.529
2022-23 Elmira D3 — — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7560
Forward overall
#363
Forward born in 2004
#2539
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Janna Haeg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kendall Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sofia Poinar
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Renee Saltness
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tianna Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Janna Haeg
St. Cloud State ·
0.303 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kendall Williamson
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sofia Poinar
Minnesota State ·
0.028 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.