← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mackaylan McGown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Eagan High USHS-MN-W 25 4 1 5 0.200 0.0302 0.0302
2020-21 Eagan High USHS-MN-W 19 1 3 4 0.210 0.0318 0.0318
2021-22 Simley High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 14 9 23 0.885 0.1336 0.1336
2022-23 Simley High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 19 53 72 2.667 0.4027 0.3700
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA JR 28 20 17 37 1.321
2024-25 Concordia (WI) D3 27 11 21 32 1.185
2024-25 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 27 11 21 32 1.185
2023-24 Concordia (WI) D3 27 9 10 19 0.704
2023-24 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2023-24 · Concordia (WI)
+198.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2896
Forward overall
#98
Forward born in 2005
#332
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.37 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota State ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.