← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lily Mortenson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 5 6 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664
2019-20 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 11 14 0.560 0.0846 0.0846
2020-21 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 18 5 4 9 0.500 0.0755 0.0755
2021-22 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 28 12 11 23 0.821 0.1240 0.1240
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 28 11 17 28 1.000
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 28 22 24 46 1.643
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 22 1 11 12 0.545
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 30 13 13 26 0.867
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2022-23 · Gustavus Adolphus
+903.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7769
Forward overall
#369
Forward born in 2004
#2071
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

North Dakota ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Merrimack ·
0.206 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.