IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Solvei Berg-Messerole Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 St. Paul Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 24 3 8 11 0.458 0.0692 0.0692 — —
2018-19 Two Rivers/St. Paul (W) USHS-MN-W 24 4 5 9 0.375 0.0566 0.0566 — —
2019-20 Two Rivers/St. Paul (W) USHS-MN-W 25 10 5 15 0.600 0.0906 0.0906 — —
2020-21 Two Rivers/St. Paul (W) USHS-MN-W 19 10 7 17 0.895 0.1351 0.1351 — —
2021-22 Two Rivers/St. Paul (W) USHS-MN-W 27 24 25 49 1.815 0.2740 0.2740 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Olaf D3 — — 26 10 12 22 0.846
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 — — 25 13 16 29 1.160
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 — — 26 12 14 26 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2022-23 · St. Olaf
+524.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3943
Forward overall
#173
Forward born in 2004
#612
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Voight
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amy Petersen
Penn State ·
0.784 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.