IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jillian Bilsborough Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Lakeshore Lightning USHS-W 20 15 9 24 1.200 0.3608 0.3608 — —
2021-22 Lakeshore Lightning USHS-W 19 16 7 23 1.210 0.3640 0.3640 — —
2022-23 Lakeshore Lightning USHS-W 23 21 11 32 1.391 0.4184 0.4184 — —
2023-24 Lakeshore Lightning USHS-W 22 31 9 40 1.818 0.5467 0.5467 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA — 20 9 11 20 1.000
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA — 27 9 4 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2024-25 · Aurora
+13.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1223
Forward overall
#46
Forward born in 2006
#402
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.54 No data
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.53 No data
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saana Valkama
Vermont ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.