IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kallie Tibbetts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Princeton High USHS-MN-W 25 6 3 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544 — —
2016-17 Princeton High USHS-MN-W 24 2 4 6 0.250 0.0377 0.0377 — —
2017-18 Princeton High USHS-MN-W 25 4 4 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483 — —
2018-19 Princeton High USHS-MN-W 25 24 19 43 1.720 0.2597 0.2597 — —
2019-20 Princeton High USHS-MN-W 24 20 32 52 2.167 0.3272 0.3272 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bethel D3 MIAC — 25 7 11 18 0.720
2023-24 Bethel D3 MIAC — 27 6 6 12 0.444
2022-23 Bethel D3 MIAC — 24 7 11 18 0.750
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2712
Forward overall
#120
Forward born in 2002
#290
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emily Gunderson
Lindenwood ·
0.171 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mariah Gardner
Minnesota State ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amy Petersen
Penn State ·
0.784 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.