IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jenna Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 North Wright County USHS-MN-W 18 2 3 5 0.278 0.0419 0.0419 — —
2021-22 North Wright County USHS-MN-W 26 4 8 12 0.462 0.0697 0.0697 — —
2022-23 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 28 6 8 14 0.500 0.0755 0.0707 — —
2023-24 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 28 11 15 26 0.929 0.1402 0.1255 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 25 8 10 18 0.720
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 29 5 12 17 0.586
2015-16 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 23 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 19 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7524
Forward overall
#318
Forward born in 2005
#1956
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Suvi Ollikainen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kylie Hanley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rose Rather
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Suvi Ollikainen
St. Cloud State ·
0.151 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holly Dietzler
Lindenwood ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Bonfe
Merrimack ·
0.206 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.