← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morgan Mitchell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 21 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 18 1 1 2 0.111 0.0168 0.0168
2021-22 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 3 6 0.240 0.0362 0.0362
2022-23 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 25 5 4 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0517
2023-24 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 27 15 14 29 1.074 0.1622 0.1473
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 25 8 10 18 0.720
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 23 1 6 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2024-25 · St. Scholastica
+225.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7796
Forward overall
#359
Forward born in 2006
#2080
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.53 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota State ·
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
North Dakota ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.