IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morgan Sauvageau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Fargo Davies High USHS-W 25 8 10 18 0.720 0.2165 0.2165 — —
2019-20 Fargo Davies High USHS-W 24 12 17 29 1.208 0.3633 0.3633 — —
2020-21 Fargo Davies High USHS-W 26 24 25 49 1.885 0.5667 0.5667 — —
2021-22 Fargo Davies High USHS-W 26 24 27 51 1.962 0.5898 0.5898 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 6 12 18 0.720
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 10 6 16 0.640
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 6 5 11 0.440
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 11 2 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2022-23 · Concordia
+37.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#603
Forward overall
#198
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brynn Puppe
Williams · 2016-17
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mollie Johnson
Neumann · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Amber Heidenreich
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.