Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Roseville High | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.222 | 0.0336 | 0.0336 |
| 2022-23 | Roseville/Mahtomedi High | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 6 | 17 | 23 | 0.885 | 0.1336 | 0.1345 |
| 2023-24 | Roseville/Mahtomedi High | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 3 | 20 | 23 | 0.885 | 0.1336 | 0.1289 |
| 2024-25 | Roseville/Mahtomedi High | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 3 | 21 | 24 | 0.923 | 0.1394 | 0.1291 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Bethel | MIAC | FR | 26 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 0.500 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ebba Strandberg | SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG | 0.333 | Maine |
| Kenzie Prater | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG | 0.432 | Quinnipiac |
| Emma Turbyville | NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG | 0.040 | St. Cloud State |
| Allison Roethke | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG | 0.000 | Quinnipiac |
| Taylor Flaherty | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG | 0.000 | North Dakota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Martell | 2011-12 · 0.95 PPG | 0.333 | Stevenson | UCHC |
| Delaney Howard | 2024-25 · 0.55 PPG | 0.565 | Wilkes | MAC |
| Brooke Klemz | 2023-24 · 1.15 PPG | 0.280 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Morgan Mitchell | 2023-24 · 1.07 PPG | 0.304 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Brooklyn Riley | 2024-25 · 0.37 PPG | 0.806 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.