← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Ebba Strandberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-06-22 Country: Sweden
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.17
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1763
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

No valid junior or college data

D1W / D3W Likelihood

10%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
90%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 HV71 SDHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.1283 0.1283
2013-14 MoDo Hockey SDHL 26 0 2 2 0.077 0.0888 0.0888
2014-15 MoDo Hockey SDHL 25 2 13 15 0.600 0.6930 0.6930
2015-16 MoDo Hockey SDHL 35 1 6 7 0.200 0.2310 0.2310
2020-21 Brynäs IF SDHL 34 1 5 6 0.176 0.2039 0.2039
2021-22 Brynäs IF SDHL 34 0 7 7 0.206 0.2378 0.2378
2023-24 Frölunda HC SDHL 36 1 7 8 0.222 0.2566 0.2149
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2019-20 Maine 35 0 4 4 0.114
2018-19 Maine 27 1 2 3 0.111
2017-18 Maine HEA-W SO 30 2 9 11 0.367
2016-17 Maine HEA-W FR 9 0 3 3 0.333

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG 0.611 Ohio State
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota
Mekenzie Steffen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.350 Wisconsin

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.