Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Winchendon | NE-Prep-Girls | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2012-13 | Winchendon | NE-Prep-Girls | 26 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 0.730 | 0.3359 | 0.3359 |
| 2013-14 | Winchendon | NE-Prep-Girls | 29 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 1.030 | 0.4739 | 0.4739 |
| 2017-18 | Vanke Rays | CWHL | 23 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.087 | N/A | N/A |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Northeastern | HEA-W | SR | 33 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 0.636 |
| 2016-17 | Northeastern | HEA-W | JR | 37 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.270 |
| 2015-16 | Northeastern | HEA-W | SO | 36 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0.556 |
| 2014-15 | Northeastern | HEA-W | FR | 34 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0.382 |
| 2013-14 | Dartmouth | ECAC-W | SR | 26 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.115 |
| 2013-14 | Northeastern | HEA-W | — | 34 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 0.941 |
| 2012-13 | Dartmouth | ECAC-W | JR | 22 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.136 |
| 2012-13 | Northeastern | HEA-W | — | 36 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 0.778 |
| 2011-12 | Dartmouth | ECAC-W | SO | 29 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.138 |
| 2010-11 | Dartmouth | ECAC-W | FR | 24 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.208 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Briana Mastel | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG | 0.258 | Harvard |
| Anna Wright | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG | 0.000 | Maine |
| Taylor Marchin | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG | 0.207 | Yale |
| Meghan Turner | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG | 0.351 | Quinnipiac |
| Kendra Nealey | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG | 0.212 | Cornell |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.