← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Taylor Marchin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-26 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.39
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4125
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.39
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4143
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 Choate NE-Prep-Girls 22 7 10 17 0.770 0.3543 0.3543
2018-19 Connecticut Whale PHF 13 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2019-20 Connecticut Whale PHF 24 0 3 3 0.125 N/A N/A
2020-21 Connecticut Whale PHF 4 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2021-22 Connecticut Whale PHF 14 1 1 2 0.143 N/A N/A
2022-23 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 21 0 1 1 0.048 N/A N/A
2023-24 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 21 0 1 1 0.048 N/A N/A
2024-25 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 21 0 1 1 0.048 N/A N/A
2025-26 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 21 0 1 1 0.048 N/A N/A
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2016-17 Yale ECAC-W 31 7 12 19 0.613
2015-16 Yale ECAC-W 29 1 5 6 0.207

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Lauren Kelly NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG 0.208 Dartmouth
Anna Wright NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG 0.000 Maine
Anna Kilponen SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG 0.257 North Dakota
Christa Vuglar USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG 0.205 RIT
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG 0.611 Ohio State

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.