← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Dani Sadek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA

NCAA-W Projection

Projecting as:

Target Conference:

Show:

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W

0.36

Average (0.25–0.45)

Base NCAAe-W PPG0.3818

Conf. Strength0.994

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg

0.50

Average (0.35–0.65)

Base D3e-W PPG0.5271

Conf. Strength1.000

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-W PPG	Age-Adjusted
2010-11	Lakeville North High	USHS-MN-W	25	4	11	15	0.600	0.0964	0.0964
2011-12	Lakeville North High	USHS-MN-W	25	9	19	28	1.120	0.1799	0.1799
2012-13	Lakeville North High	USHS-MN-W	24	8	27	35	1.458	0.2342	0.2342
2013-14	Lakeville North High	USHS-MN-W	24	7	26	33	1.375	0.2208	0.2208

NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

Season	School	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2017-18	Ohio State	WCHA-W	—	39	3	14	17	0.436
2016-17	Ohio State	WCHA-W	—	35	3	12	15	0.429
2015-16	Ohio State	WCHA-W	—	36	4	18	22	0.611

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

Player	League · Season · PPG	FR College PPG	School
Grace Bizal	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG	0.268	Boston College
Kate Hallett	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG	0.100	Harvard
Katie Robinson	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG	0.129	Minnesota
Mekenzie Steffen	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG	0.350	Wisconsin
Christa Vuglar	USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG	0.205	RIT

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.