Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Brock Univ. | USports-W | 18 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.222 | 0.0978 | 0.1017 |
| 2017-18 | Markham Thunder | CWHL | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.048 | N/A | N/A |
| 2019-20 | Buffalo Beauts | PHF | 16 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.375 | N/A | N/A |
| 2020-21 | Buffalo Beauts | PHF | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | HPK | SMLIIGA-W | 12 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.500 | 0.1945 | 0.1663 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | SUNY Plattsburgh | SUNYAC | FR | 24 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 0.458 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Hallett | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.100 | Harvard |
| Katie Robinson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.129 | Minnesota |
| Lauren Boyle | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG | 0.486 | Ohio State |
| Grace Bizal | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG | 0.268 | Boston College |
| Mekenzie Steffen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG | 0.350 | Wisconsin |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann-Frédérique Guay | 2024-25 · 0.31 PPG | 1.103 | Norwich | NEHC |
| Meg Aiken | 2025-26 · 0.64 PPG | 0.476 | Castleton | NEHC |
| Kayson Ruegge | 2023-24 · 0.77 PPG | 0.500 | SUNY Plattsburgh | SUNYAC |
| Mae Olshansky | 2025-26 · 0.35 PPG | — | SUNY Plattsburgh | SUNYAC |
| Bella Schmidt | 2021-22 · 1.27 PPG | 0.292 | Suffolk | NEHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.