← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Katie Robinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-10-08 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.14
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1456
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.53
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5659
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2010-11 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 1 5 6 0.250 0.0401 0.0401
2011-12 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 20 24 0.960 0.1542 0.1542
2012-13 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 4 22 26 1.083 0.1740 0.1740
2013-14 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 3 4 7 0.304 0.0489 0.0489
2014-15 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 11 25 36 1.440 0.2313 0.2313
2015-16 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 13 26 39 1.560 0.2505 0.2505
2020-21 TPS SMLIIGA-W 21 3 11 14 0.667 0.2528 0.2528
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2019-20 Minnesota WCHA-W 36 3 0 3 0.083
2018-19 Minnesota WCHA-W 22 2 1 3 0.136
2017-18 Minnesota WCHA-W SO 32 2 2 4 0.125
2016-17 Minnesota WCHA-W FR 31 3 1 4 0.129

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG 0.611 Ohio State
Anna Kilponen SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG 0.257 North Dakota
Christa Vuglar USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG 0.205 RIT
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.