← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Emma Turbyville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.19
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2018
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.14
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1490
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2010-11 Loyola Academy USHS-W 14 7 4 11 0.786 0.2287 0.2287
2011-12 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 53 6 16 22 0.415 0.1208 0.1208
2012-13 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 61 5 12 17 0.279 0.0811 0.0811
2013-14 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 31 4 8 12 0.387 0.1127 0.1127
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2017-18 St. Cloud State WCHA-W SR 33 0 11 11 0.333
2016-17 St. Cloud State WCHA-W JR 35 1 4 5 0.143
2015-16 St. Cloud State WCHA-W SO 25 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 St. Cloud State WCHA-W FR 25 0 1 1 0.040

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Briana Jorde USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG 0.077 Bemidji State
Taylor Flaherty USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.000 North Dakota
Cheyenne Harris USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.324 Union
Taylor Turnquist USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.171 Clarkson
Arianna Kosakowski NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG 0.000 Union

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.