← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Taylor Flaherty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-16 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.24
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2527
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.27
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2839
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2010-11 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 0 3 3 0.120 0.0193 0.0193
2011-12 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 9 8 17 0.680 0.1092 0.1092
2012-13 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 11 8 19 0.760 0.1221 0.1221
2013-14 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 22 7 7 14 0.636 0.1022 0.1022
2014-15 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 9 12 21 0.840 0.1349 0.1349
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2018-19 Vermont 35 3 8 11 0.314
2017-18 Vermont HEA-W JR 26 4 4 8 0.308
2016-17 North Dakota 15 1 1 2 0.133
2015-16 North Dakota 24 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kenzie Prater USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG 0.432 Quinnipiac
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac
Ebba Strandberg SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.333 Maine
Arianna Kosakowski NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG 0.000 Union
Emma Turbyville USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.