← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Kenzie Prater Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-11-18 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.26
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2751
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.35
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3727
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2011-12 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 9 12 21 0.840 0.1349 0.1349
2012-13 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 24 5 15 20 0.833 0.1338 0.1338
2013-14 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 19 10 8 18 0.947 0.1522 0.1522
2014-15 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 21 7 10 17 0.809 0.1300 0.1300
2015-16 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 10 18 28 1.120 0.1799 0.1799
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2019-20 Quinnipiac ECAC-W SR 37 5 11 16 0.432
2018-19 Quinnipiac ECAC-W JR 36 3 5 8 0.222
2017-18 Quinnipiac ECAC-W SO 29 4 3 7 0.241
2016-17 Quinnipiac ECAC-W FR 37 6 10 16 0.432

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Mekenzie Steffen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.350 Wisconsin
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.