← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Lauren Boyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-06 Country: USA

NCAA-W Projection

Projecting as:

Target Conference:

Show:

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W

0.36

Average (0.25–0.45)

Base NCAAe-W PPG0.3818

Conf. Strength0.994

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg

0.35

Developing (<0.35)

Base D3e-W PPG0.3683

Conf. Strength1.000

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-W PPG	Age-Adjusted
2011-12	Eden Prairie High (W)	USHS-MN-W	25	3	7	10	0.400	0.0642	0.0642
2012-13	Eden Prairie High (W)	USHS-MN-W	25	6	7	13	0.520	0.0835	0.0835
2013-14	Eden Prairie High (W)	USHS-MN-W	25	13	14	27	1.080	0.1734	0.1734
2014-15	Eden Prairie High (W)	USHS-MN-W	25	8	15	23	0.920	0.1478	0.1478

NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

Season	School	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	Ohio State	WCHA-W	SR	33	2	11	13	0.394
2017-18	Ohio State	WCHA-W	JR	39	5	21	26	0.667
2016-17	Ohio State	WCHA-W	SO	32	6	8	14	0.438
2015-16	Ohio State	WCHA-W	FR	35	3	14	17	0.486

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

Player	League · Season · PPG	FR College PPG	School
Kenzie Prater	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG	0.432	Quinnipiac
Mekenzie Steffen	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG	0.350	Wisconsin
Allison Roethke	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG	0.000	Quinnipiac
Ebba Strandberg	SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG	0.333	Maine
Arianna Kosakowski	NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG	0.000	Union

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.