← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Allison Roethke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.08
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0870
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.29
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3067
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2011-12 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 7 6 13 0.520 0.0835 0.0835
2012-13 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 5 15 20 0.800 0.1285 0.1285
2013-14 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 6 10 16 0.640 0.1028 0.1028
2014-15 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 24 8 21 29 1.208 0.1941 0.1941
2015-16 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 4 10 14 0.560 0.0899 0.0899
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2019-20 Quinnipiac ECAC-W SR 27 1 1 2 0.074
2018-19 Quinnipiac ECAC-W JR 35 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Quinnipiac ECAC-W SO 35 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Quinnipiac ECAC-W FR 26 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mckenzie Revering USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG 0.059 Minnesota Duluth
McKenna Wesloh USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG 0.273 Ohio State
Kate Rydland USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG 0.161 Penn State
Andrea Olson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG 0.056 Merrimack
Lauren Boyle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG 0.486 Ohio State

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.