← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Arianna Kosakowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-13 Country: USA

NCAA-W Projection

Projecting as:

Target Conference:

Show:

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W

0.27

Average (0.25–0.45)

Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2824

Conf. Strength0.994

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg

0.18

Developing (<0.35)

Base D3e-W PPG0.1945

Conf. Strength1.000

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-W PPG	Age-Adjusted
2011-12	Winchendon	NE-Prep-Girls	2	0	1	1	0.500	0.2301	0.2301
2012-13	Winchendon	NE-Prep-Girls	26	0	7	7	0.270	0.1242	0.1242
2013-14	The Winchendon School	USHS-W	37	14	23	37	1.000	0.2911	0.2832
2014-15	Winchendon	NE-Prep-Girls	24	1	1	2	0.080	0.0368	0.0368

NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

Season	School	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	Union	ECAC-W	SR	33	4	8	12	0.364
2017-18	Union	ECAC-W	JR	34	5	11	16	0.471
2016-17	Union	ECAC-W	SO	34	2	4	6	0.176
2015-16	Union	ECAC-W	FR	34	0	0	0	0.000

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

Player	League · Season · PPG	FR College PPG	School
Serena Sommerfield	NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG	0.000	Boston College
Brinna Dochniak	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG	0.111	RIT
Grace Bowlby	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG	0.316	Wisconsin
Heather Olson	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG	0.143	Bemidji State
Xylia Lang	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG	0.091	Lindenwood

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.