← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Katarina Seper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.06
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0669
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.26
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2705
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2011-12 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 13 0 1 1 0.077 0.0124 0.0124
2012-13 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 0 4 4 0.160 0.0257 0.0257
2013-14 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 24 1 6 7 0.292 0.0468 0.0468
2014-15 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 24 8 8 16 0.667 0.1071 0.1071
2015-16 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 9 10 19 0.760 0.1221 0.1221
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2017-18 RPI 18 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 RPI ECAC-W 20 0 1 1 0.050

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Taylor Flaherty USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.000 North Dakota
Arianna Kosakowski NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG 0.000 Union
Ebba Strandberg SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.333 Maine
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac
Emma Turbyville USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.