| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 59 | 11 | 27 | 38 | 0.644 | 0.3800 | 0.4010 | 1.9345 | 2.0414 |
| 2007-08 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 59 | 19 | 38 | 57 | 0.966 | 0.5699 | 0.5722 | 2.9016 | 2.9131 |
| 2014-15 | Ilves | Liiga | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.500 | 1.2500 | 1.2930 | 4.2980 | 4.4458 |
| 2015-16 | Ilves | Liiga | 41 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.244 | 0.6098 | 0.6051 | 2.0966 | 2.0803 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 39 | 5 | 22 | 27 | 0.692 |
| 2009-10 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 38 | 10 | 28 | 38 | 1.000 |
| 2008-09 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 37 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.351 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.