← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reese Heitzman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 7 9 16 0.762 0.1150 0.1150
2021-22 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 29 13 13 26 0.897 0.1354 0.1354
2022-23 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 21 12 33 1.100 0.1661 0.1542
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC JR 25 6 10 16 0.640
2024-25 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SO 23 9 9 18 0.783
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 23 9 9 18 0.783
2023-24 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC FR 23 17 9 26 1.130
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 27 17 9 26 0.963
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.13
2023-24 · Saint Mary's
+800.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5439
Forward overall
#223
Forward born in 2005
#1106
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.