Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Shakopee High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 17 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.412 | 0.0622 | 0.0622 |
| 2021-22 | Shakopee High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 0.593 | 0.0895 | 0.0895 |
| 2022-23 | Shakopee High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 0.917 | 0.1384 | 0.1400 |
| 2023-24 | Shakopee High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0.923 | 0.1394 | 0.1352 |
| 2024-25 | Shakopee High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 1.231 | 0.1859 | 0.1731 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Norbert | NCHA | FR | 29 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 0.517 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gabbie Hughes | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 1.121 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Andrea Renner | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG | 0.167 | Northeastern |
| Liz Schepers | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG | 0.410 | Ohio State |
| Paige Beebe | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.12 PPG | 0.472 | Bemidji State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lula Swanson | 2022-23 · 1.26 PPG | 0.333 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| McKayla Romano | 2024-25 · 0.62 PPG | 0.680 | Lebanon Valley | MAC |
| Malorie Anderson | 2023-24 · 1.04 PPG | — | Concordia | MIAC |
| Josie Grossman | 2024-25 · 1.04 PPG | 0.400 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Ellin Rees | 2023-24 · 0.80 PPG | 0.536 | Norwich | LittleEast |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.