Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Lakeville South High | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.714 | 0.1079 | 0.1079 |
| 2022-23 | Lakeville South High | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 1.192 | 0.1800 | 0.1834 |
| 2023-24 | Lakeville South High | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 18 | 23 | 41 | 1.464 | 0.2211 | 0.2161 |
| 2024-25 | Lakeville South High | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 1.037 | 0.1566 | 0.1470 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC | FR | 25 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.400 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivy Dynek | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG | 0.000 | St. Cloud State |
| Katie Detert | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG | 0.000 | St. Cloud State |
| Annie Roche | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG | 0.000 | Colgate |
| Carly Bullock | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.812 | Princeton |
| Emily Antony | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.444 | Minnesota State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Schmidt | 2023-24 · 1.07 PPG | 0.333 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| McKenna Sandberg | 2022-23 · 1.23 PPG | 0.280 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Kayleigh Olson | 2024-25 · 2.08 PPG | 0.167 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Kaylynn Fisher | 2025-26 · 0.90 PPG | — | RPI | ECAC |
| Alyson Vogelsang | 2022-23 · 0.89 PPG | — | St. Catherine | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.