← New Search ↗ Social Card

Leah Hatcher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-07-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 19 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 25 1 1 2 0.080 0.0121 0.0121
2019-20 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 25 3 2 5 0.200 0.0302 0.0302
2020-21 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 16 0 6 6 0.375 0.0566 0.0566
2021-22 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 26 1 13 14 0.538 0.0813 0.0813
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 SR 27 1 13 14 0.518
2024-25 Arcadia D3 26 1 14 15 0.577
2023-24 Arcadia D3 23 0 9 9 0.391
2022-23 Arcadia D3 24 3 7 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2022-23 · Arcadia
+723.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4261
Defenseman overall
#506
Defenseman born in 2004
#3578
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Penn State ·
0.161 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.040 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.486 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.