← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hanley Block Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 10 9 19 0.760 0.1148 0.1148
2019-20 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 9 9 18 0.720 0.1087 0.1087
2020-21 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 9 14 23 1.095 0.1654 0.1654
2021-22 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 11 11 22 0.846 0.1278 0.1278
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 24 6 7 13 0.542
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 25 4 5 9 0.360
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 25 3 5 8 0.320
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 20 3 4 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · St. Scholastica
+233.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5837
Forward overall
#246
Forward born in 2003
#1261
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindenwood ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Merrimack ·
0.206 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.