IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ruby Eskin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 22 5 4 9 0.409 0.0618 0.0618 — —
2020-21 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 20 4 4 8 0.400 0.0604 0.0604 — —
2021-22 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 27 10 11 21 0.778 0.1174 0.1174 — —
2022-23 Roseville/Mahtomedi High USHS-MN-W 26 10 10 20 0.769 0.1161 0.1121 — —
2023-24 Roseville/Mahtomedi High USHS-MN-W 26 11 17 28 1.077 0.1626 0.1501 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 27 3 10 13 0.481
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 29 7 9 16 0.552
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2024-25 · Augsburg
+377.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5732
Forward overall
#246
Forward born in 2006
#1230
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Emily Antony
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Semmel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carly Bullock
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Antony
Minnesota State ·
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sierra Semmel
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.