IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aimée Seppenwolde Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-30 Country: Netherlands
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 BB&N NE-Prep-Girls 28 0 2 2 0.070 0.0434 0.0434 — —
2018-19 BB&N NE-Prep-Girls 26 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 BB&N NE-Prep-Girls 31 0 1 1 0.030 0.0186 0.0186 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 24 5 7 12 0.500
2024-25 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 24 5 4 9 0.375
2023-24 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 24 1 5 6 0.250
2022-23 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 19 2 1 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2022-23 · Wesleyan
+547.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16406
Forward overall
#633
Forward born in 2003
#1543
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Amber Moore
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.05 PPG
→ Cornell (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Anna Johnson
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mullins
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Becca Gilmore
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (1.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Annelise Rice
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexa March
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Danychuk
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tegan Konecnik
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.038 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.