Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Duluth High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 19 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.263 | 0.0397 | 0.0397 |
| 2021-22 | Duluth High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.280 | 0.0423 | 0.0423 |
| 2022-23 | Duluth High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.520 | 0.0785 | 0.0698 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | JR | 25 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.360 |
| 2024-25 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | SO | 23 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.217 |
| 2023-24 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | FR | 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.042 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tristen Truax | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG | 0.167 | Minnesota State |
| Kelsey Crow | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG | 0.160 | Penn State |
| Jessica Adolfsson | SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG | 0.343 | Penn State |
| Jordan Jackson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG | 0.130 | Minnesota State |
| Abby Ecker | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG | 0.000 | Bemidji State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Reardon | 2022-23 · 0.42 PPG | 0.407 | Adrian | NCHA |
| Bella Webb | 2022-23 · 0.56 PPG | 0.316 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Ava Johansson | 2022-23 · 1.23 PPG | 0.130 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Macy Peterson | 2022-23 · 0.93 PPG | 0.194 | Post | CHA-W |
| Kailin Kane | 2023-24 · 0.28 PPG | 0.625 | Johnson & Wales | NEHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.