← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Tristen Truax Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-08-05 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.29
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.3055
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.45
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4731
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 Shakopee High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 4 7 11 0.458 0.0736 0.0736
2013-14 Shakopee High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 13 8 21 0.840 0.1349 0.1349
2014-15 Shakopee High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 15 8 23 0.920 0.1478 0.1478
2015-16 Shakopee High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 21 8 29 1.160 0.1863 0.1863
2016-17 Shakopee High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 18 14 32 1.333 0.2141 0.2141
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2020-21 Minnesota WCHA-W 17 2 5 7 0.412
2019-20 Minnesota WCHA-W 37 8 4 12 0.324
2018-19 Minnesota WCHA-W 35 4 5 9 0.257
2017-18 Minnesota WCHA-W 30 4 1 5 0.167
2017-18 Minnesota State WCHA-W FR 30 4 1 5 0.167

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG 0.611 Ohio State
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota
Mekenzie Steffen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.350 Wisconsin

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.