← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Abby Ecker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-27 Country: USA

NCAA-W Projection

Projecting as:

Target Conference:

Show:

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W

0.13

Developing (<0.25)

Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1326

Conf. Strength0.994

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg

0.36

Average (0.35–0.65)

Base D3e-W PPG0.3857

Conf. Strength1.000

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-W PPG	Age-Adjusted
2012-13	Prairie Centre High (W)	USHS-MN-W	24	2	8	10	0.417	0.0669	0.0669
2013-14	Prairie Centre High (W)	USHS-MN-W	24	5	5	10	0.417	0.0669	0.0669
2014-15	Prairie Centre High (W)	USHS-MN-W	25	12	12	24	0.960	0.1542	0.1542
2015-16	Prairie Centre High (W)	USHS-MN-W	23	7	15	22	0.957	0.1536	0.1536
2016-17	Prairie Centre High (W)	USHS-MN-W	25	17	10	27	1.080	0.1734	0.1734

NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

Season	School	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2020-21	Bemidji State	CHA-W	—	20	1	2	3	0.150
2019-20	Bemidji State	CHA-W	—	30	0	2	2	0.067
2018-19	Bemidji State	CHA-W	—	36	0	0	0	0.000
2017-18	Bemidji State	CHA-W	—	36	0	0	0	0.000

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

Player	League · Season · PPG	FR College PPG	School
Kate Hallett	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG	0.100	Harvard
Katie Robinson	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG	0.129	Minnesota
Mekenzie Steffen	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG	0.350	Wisconsin
Grace Bizal	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG	0.268	Boston College
Kenzie Prater	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG	0.432	Quinnipiac

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.