Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Tartan Senior High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.200 | 0.0321 | 0.0321 |
| 2011-12 | Tartan Senior High | USHS-MN-W | 22 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 0.500 | 0.0803 | 0.0803 |
| 2012-13 | Tartan Senior High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.440 | 0.0707 | 0.0707 |
| 2013-14 | Tartan Senior High | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 0.792 | 0.1271 | 0.1271 |
| 2014-15 | Tartan Senior High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 0.640 | 0.1028 | 0.1028 |
| 2015-16 | North St. Paul/Tartan (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 1.160 | 0.1863 | 0.1863 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Minnesota | WCHA-W | — | 31 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.065 |
| 2018-19 | Minnesota | WCHA-W | — | 35 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.057 |
| 2017-18 | Minnesota | WCHA-W | — | 33 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.212 |
| 2017-18 | Minnesota State | WCHA-W | SO | 33 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.212 |
| 2016-17 | Minnesota | WCHA-W | — | 23 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.130 |
| 2016-17 | Minnesota State | WCHA-W | FR | 23 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.130 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Bizal | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG | 0.268 | Boston College |
| Kate Hallett | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.100 | Harvard |
| Katie Robinson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.129 | Minnesota |
| Mekenzie Steffen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG | 0.350 | Wisconsin |
| Dani Sadek | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG | 0.611 | Ohio State |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.