IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maeghan Forsyth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0585 0.0585 — —
2022-23 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 30 3 10 13 0.433 0.1013 0.1013 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 28 0 11 11 0.393
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 28 0 11 11 0.393
2024-25 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 25 2 1 3 0.120
2024-25 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 25 2 1 3 0.120
2024-25 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — — 25 2 1 3 0.120
2023-24 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 24 0 3 3 0.125
2023-24 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 26 0 4 4 0.154
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — — 26 0 4 4 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2023-24 · Plattsburgh
+30.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2790
Defenseman overall
#342
Defenseman born in 2005
#88
in SFMAAAHL-W

D1 Comparables

Briana Jorde
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Kimmerle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Megan Hinze
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Briana Jorde
Bemidji State ·
0.077 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Cheyenne Harris
Union ·
0.324 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Turnquist
Clarkson ·
0.171 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.