← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Cheyenne Harris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-04 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.22
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2355
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.27
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2875
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 8 8 16 0.640 0.1028 0.1028
2013-14 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 24 6 9 15 0.625 0.1004 0.1004
2014-15 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 7 9 0.360 0.0578 0.0578
2015-16 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 23 26 1.040 0.1670 0.1670
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2019-20 Union ECAC-W SR 34 1 10 11 0.324
2018-19 Union ECAC-W JR 34 1 5 6 0.176
2017-18 Union ECAC-W SO 34 6 15 21 0.618
2016-17 Union ECAC-W FR 34 4 7 11 0.324

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mekenzie Steffen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.350 Wisconsin
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Kenzie Prater USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG 0.432 Quinnipiac

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.