← New Search ↗ Social Card

Madison Lavergne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 0 2 2 0.083 0.0126 0.0126
2018-19 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 5 7 12 0.480 0.0725 0.0725
2019-20 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 10 18 28 1.120 0.1691 0.1691
2020-21 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 22 21 43 1.954 0.2951 0.2951
2021-22 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 16 16 32 1.067 0.1611 0.1611
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SR 31 3 7 10 0.323
2024-25 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 30 10 20 30 1.000
2023-24 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 31 10 6 16 0.516
2022-23 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 29 14 14 28 0.966
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2022-23 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+797.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3500
Forward overall
#129
Forward born in 2003
#491
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.