IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlotte Crudale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-10-06 Country: USA
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Anaheim Lady Ducks 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 50 6 9 15 0.300 0.1345 0.1385 — —
2023-24 Anaheim Lady Ducks 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 53 13 14 27 0.509 0.2284 0.2254 — —
2024-25 Anaheim Lady Ducks 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 58 20 35 55 0.948 0.3229 0.3240 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2981
Forward overall
#98
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sylvia Marolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Demi Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Addison Andre
Franklin Pierce · 2024-25
0.676 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Katelyn Brightbill
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.844 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rachel Anderson
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.