← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ava Schmidt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 24 0 2 2 0.083 0.0126 0.0126
2019-20 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 25 11 9 20 0.800 0.1208 0.1208
2020-21 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 18 6 18 24 1.333 0.2013 0.2013
2021-22 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 24 12 23 35 1.458 0.2202 0.2202
2022-23 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 25 6 16 22 0.880 0.1329 0.1254
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Endicott D3 JR 27 3 5 8 0.296
2024-25 Endicott D3 NEHC 17 0 4 4 0.235
2023-24 Endicott D3 NEHC 16 1 1 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2023-24 · Endicott
-10.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4314
Forward overall
#171
Forward born in 2005
#732
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Cloud State ·
0.151 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holy Cross ·
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.