IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samantha Moehle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 25 20 10 30 1.200 0.1812 0.1812 — —
2019-20 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 25 9 9 18 0.720 0.1087 0.1087 — —
2020-21 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 20 18 11 29 1.450 0.2189 0.2189 — —
2021-22 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 25 26 20 46 1.840 0.2778 0.2778 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 28 1 7 8 0.286
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 22 3 10 13 0.591
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 19 0 2 2 0.105
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 12 1 0 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
-59.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3154
Forward overall
#117
Forward born in 2003
#398
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Voight
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amy Petersen
Penn State ·
0.784 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.