IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emily Schoeberl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Eagan High USHS-MN-W 25 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Eagan High USHS-MN-W 25 3 3 6 0.240 0.0362 0.0362 — —
2020-21 Eagan High USHS-MN-W 19 5 5 10 0.526 0.0795 0.0795 — —
2021-22 Eagan High USHS-MN-W 26 8 13 21 0.808 0.1220 0.1220 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 27 4 2 6 0.222
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 28 4 7 11 0.393
2023-24 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 26 6 12 18 0.692
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 27 8 4 12 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · Augsburg
+325.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8473
Forward overall
#2392
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Rose Rather
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tianna Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Renee Saltness
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rose Rather
Holy Cross ·
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tianna Gunderson
Minnesota ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Renee Saltness
Quinnipiac ·
0.029 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.