← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paige Blattner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 River Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 River Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 5 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544
2019-20 River Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 9 15 0.600 0.0906 0.0906
2020-21 River Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 6 4 10 0.476 0.0719 0.0719
2021-22 River Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 5 15 20 0.645 0.0974 0.0974
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 25 0 6 6 0.240
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 25 1 3 4 0.160
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 24 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · St. Scholastica
1.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3088
Defenseman overall
#2428
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Union ·
0.324 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Clarkson ·
0.171 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.077 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.