← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adriana Urban Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hoosac School USHS-W 17 9 15 24 1.412 0.4245 0.4245
2022-23 Hoosac School USHS-W 23 11 16 27 1.174 0.3530 0.3530
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2024-25 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 28 3 8 11 0.393
2024-25 Plattsburgh State D3 28 3 8 11 0.393
2024-25 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 28 3 8 11 0.393
2023-24 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 23 2 9 11 0.478
2023-24 Plattsburgh State D3 25 2 10 12 0.480
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 25 2 10 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2023-24 · Plattsburgh
+32.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#191
Defenseman overall
#38
Defenseman born in 2005
#466
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG
→ RIT (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Yale (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

North Dakota ·
0.257 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Dartmouth ·
0.208 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
RIT ·
0.205 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.