Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Winona High | USHS-MN-W | 18 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.111 | 0.0168 | 0.0168 |
| 2021-22 | Winona High | USHS-MN-W | 18 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.167 | 0.0252 | 0.0252 |
| 2022-23 | Winona High | USHS-MN-W | 17 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.647 | 0.0977 | 0.0977 |
| 2023-24 | Winona High | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 0.769 | 0.1161 | 0.1161 |
| 2024-25 | Winona High | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 19 | 7 | 26 | 0.963 | 0.1454 | 0.1454 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC | FR | 16 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.250 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivy Dynek | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG | 0.000 | St. Cloud State |
| Carly Bullock | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.812 | Princeton |
| Emily Antony | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.444 | Minnesota State |
| Katie Detert | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG | 0.000 | St. Cloud State |
| Vilma Tanskanen | SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.182 | North Dakota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shelby Evans | 2024-25 · 0.89 PPG | — | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Andrea Noss | 2013-14 · 0.52 PPG | 0.667 | SUNY Oswego | SUNYAC |
| Adrienne Hansen | 2023-24 · 0.70 PPG | 0.481 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Amber Meluzio | 2024-25 · 0.79 PPG | 0.464 | Elmira | UCHC |
| Lauren Schmidt | 2024-25 · 1.00 PPG | 0.333 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.