Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Gentry Academy (women) | USHS-MN-W | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 | 0.0252 | 0.0252 |
| 2022-23 | Gentry Academy (women) | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.179 | 0.0270 | 0.0277 |
| 2023-24 | Gentry Academy (women) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.154 | 0.0232 | 0.0228 |
| 2024-25 | Gentry Academy (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.040 | 0.0060 | 0.0057 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | FR | 14 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.143 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paige Sorensen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG | 0.529 | Merrimack |
| Hannah Schultz | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG | 0.267 | Union |
| Anna Erickson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG | 0.030 | Vermont |
| Katarina Seper | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG | 0.050 | RPI |
| McKenzie Sederberg | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG | 0.125 | Minnesota State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lexi Hueller | 2024-25 · 0.14 PPG | 0.083 | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
| Madeline Jugan | 2023-24 · 0.04 PPG | 0.333 | Concordia (WI) | NCHA |
| Madeline Hill | 2024-25 · 0.10 PPG | 0.120 | University of New England | CNE |
| Ellie French | 2023-24 · 0.20 PPG | 0.080 | Williams | NESCAC |
| Lillian Scardicchio | 2023-24 · 0.09 PPG | 0.217 | Hood College | UCHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.