| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 23 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.174 | 0.0263 | 0.0263 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 15 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.133 | 0.0201 | 0.0201 | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 0.481 | 0.0727 | 0.0702 | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Eastview High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 21 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.286 | 0.0431 | 0.0398 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Gustavus Adolphus | D3 | MIAC | — | 28 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.071 |
| 2024-25 | Gustavus Adolphus | D3 | MIAC | — | 28 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.286 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.