← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ellie Groebner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Eastview High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Eastview High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 0 4 4 0.174 0.0263 0.0263
2021-22 Eastview High (women) USHS-MN-W 15 0 2 2 0.133 0.0201 0.0201
2022-23 Eastview High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 2 11 13 0.481 0.0727 0.0702
2023-24 Eastview High (women) USHS-MN-W 21 2 4 6 0.286 0.0431 0.0398
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 28 0 2 2 0.071
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 28 0 8 8 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Gustavus Adolphus
+542.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11993
Forward overall
#588
Forward born in 2006
#4445
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Penn State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
RIT ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.