Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Anoka High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.240 | 0.0362 | 0.0362 |
| 2022-23 | Anoka High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 0.640 | 0.0966 | 0.0975 |
| 2023-24 | Anoka High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 0.704 | 0.1063 | 0.1029 |
| 2024-25 | Anoka High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 0.923 | 0.1394 | 0.1295 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC | FR | 27 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.111 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Bäckebo | SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG | 0.056 | Syracuse |
| Holly Dietzler | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG | 0.108 | Lindenwood |
| Jessica Bonfe | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG | 0.206 | Merrimack |
| Kylie Hanley | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG | 0.143 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Danielle Marmer | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG | 0.000 | Quinnipiac |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Martell | 2011-12 · 0.95 PPG | 0.333 | Stevenson | UCHC |
| Delaney Howard | 2024-25 · 0.55 PPG | 0.565 | Wilkes | MAC |
| Brooklyn Riley | 2024-25 · 0.37 PPG | 0.806 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Rachel Azuma | 2014-15 · 1.40 PPG | 0.231 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Brooke Klemz | 2023-24 · 1.15 PPG | 0.280 | Hamline | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.