← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Gaby Matson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-08 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.08
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0929
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.18
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2055
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

2%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
98%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2021-22 Culver Military Academy NE-Prep-Girls 49 4 8 12 0.245 0.0795 0.0795
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Augsburg MIAC FR 23 1 0 1 0.043
2024-25 Elmira UCHC FR 25 7 9 16 0.640

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mallorie Iozzo USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG 0.069 Minnesota Duluth
Sierra Semmel NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG 0.000 Maine
Rebecca Lindblad USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.057 UConn
Liz Trautz USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.094 Colgate
Madison Oelkers USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG 0.257 Minnesota State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Lauren Riccobelli 2024-25 · 0.52 PPG 0.320 SUNY Oswego SUNYAC
Hunter Reardon 2022-23 · 0.42 PPG 0.407 Adrian NCHA
Ava Johansson 2022-23 · 1.23 PPG 0.130 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Lily Anderson 2022-23 · 0.43 PPG 0.385 Endicott NEHC
Lauren Hornstein 2024-25 · 0.40 PPG — Hamline MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.