← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hailey Calliguri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Prague High USHS-MN-W 25 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 New Prague High USHS-MN-W 14 1 3 4 0.286 0.0431 0.0431
2021-22 New Prague High USHS-MN-W 26 2 3 5 0.192 0.0290 0.0290
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Concordia (WI) D3 27 1 2 3 0.111
2023-24 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Concordia (WI) D3 19 0 2 2 0.105
2022-23 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 17 0 1 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2022-23 · Concordia (WI)
+284.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6835
Defenseman overall
#6245
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindenwood ·
0.091 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
RIT ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.